Showing posts with label Film Industry Work. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Film Industry Work. Show all posts

Monday, 26 March 2012

“The century of film has passed” Outline the benefits to both audiences and institutions of the growth of digital technology in the film industry. What are the problems associated with this technology change?


Digital technology has brought about a huge change to how the entire film industry operates. Digital technology has allowed films to be made for less money, has made films much easier to make by many more people and has allowed marketing and distribution to come a lot easier. This has also come with the ability for consumers to much more easily transport, view and share their films which is excellent for the consumer but can lead to difficulties for the film studios such as with the ease at which one can pirate films.

Until the ‘50s, films could only be viewed in the cinema. This meant that the entire revenue of a film had to come from cinema admissions. In the 1950s televisions became popular and widespread, allowing film studios to sell their films to television channels to be broadcast after the film has stopped showing in cinemas. However, the popularity of television led to a problem, that being that people may stop going to the cinema if they could watch films and TV shows in their own home. Thus, many gimmicks were developed such as an early form of 3D in order to draw people back into cinemas.

These proved to be unsuccessful though and by the late 60s VHS was available and people could have copies of films to watch at home whenever they pleased. Like television, this allowed a new ‘release window’ to open for films. Large technology companies caught on to this and began developing large televisions and surround sound systems for the home so that one could replicate the cinema experience in their own living room. Technology also moved on from VHS to DVD in order to allow better quality pictures and wider aspect ratios. These DVDs also offered multiple extras which encouraged people to buy them even if they already owned the film on VHS.

In the late 90s the internet began to become increasingly widespread and popular and was used as a marketing tool by putting adverts up on websites and creating trailers and videos for the film and encouraging people to share them in emails etc. Eventually, internet speeds became fast enough that films could be downloaded relatively quickly. This meant that film studios could sell their films as a download, opening up yet another ‘release window’ in which to sell their film and make further profits. Of course, if the film companies are allowing people to buy digital copies of their films then these copies can be copied and shared with others, leaving the actual purchase unnecessary for anybody else. This is a problem film studios have attempted to tackle by creating anti-piracy measures such as security protected files and by suing websites such as http://thepiratebay.se which host multiple pirated film files for downloading.

One way in which film studios can stop people downloading files illegally is by offering their files through easy-to-use on demand services such as Love Film, Netflix and iTunes in high-definition and on servers that can allow the consumer to download the file as fast as possible. This at least provides an experience worth paying for as illegally downloaded files are often low-quality and slow to download. Unfortunately for the film studios, internet speeds are becoming faster and faster and these days it is not difficult obtain a broadband connection which allows one to upload or download an HD movie from a file sharing site so quickly that they can watch the movie instantly as it downloads.

More developments have also been made with physical copies of films with the advent of Blu-Ray which offers extremely high-quality 1080p full-HD video and 7.1 audio. Furthermore, as Blu-Rays are generally able to hold about 50GB of data which means even more extras can be put on BDs than on DVDs, further encouraging consumers to purchase BDs even if they own the film on other media. 3D Blu-Ray discs have also been created which allow consumers to watch films in 3D and HD on their 3D-enabled TV at home. This provides the benefit to the audience of being able to bring a technology previously only available in cinemas to their home. It also encourages more people to buy the film than download it as illegally shared 3D HD files are hard to come by on the internet and tend to be huge and difficult to download.  But while the film studios profit from the sales of 3D BDs, people become less inclined to visit the cinema, as they can have the same experience without leaving the house.

But digital technology also helps with this issue, as the continually progressing technology used in films allows films to be more cinematic (and thus more likely to draw people into cinemas), cheaper to make (which allows more money to be spent on marketing, making people so excited about the film that they want to see it as soon as it comes out in the cinema) and allows for more films to be made (providing more choice to the consumer and guaranteeing a visit to the cinema to be an enjoyable experience). One way in which this has been made possible is through the increasing use of DV cameras to make films. With DV cameras, one does not have to pay for celluloid, lighting is a lot more easily managed and the cameras are more manoeuvrable. An example of where inexpensive DV cameras have been used to shoot a film to great effect is David Lynch’s Inland Empire (2006). He shot the entire film on a moderately priced standard definition Sony camcorder which allowed him more freedom with his shots and less budget pressure, especially helpful as he was literally making up the script as he went along.

CGI technologies have also helped to increase consumption of film as CGI is now cheap and extremely advanced and can draw in bigger audiences who wish to experience something that they don’t get out of real life when they go to the cinema. This teamed with cinemas such as the IMAX in which the screen fills the whole of the audience’s eyeline and peripheral vision and the audience is completely surrounded by speakers combines to make experiences that not only make audiences want to consume more film but to visit the cinema also and really immerse themselves in films. Film studios are now also able to make more money through cinemas as, with digital prints of films rather than celluloid, they don’t have to pay large amounts of money to have the film printed multiple times and distributed to different cinemas, rather they can just copy the film and send it digitally.

In conclusion, digital technology advances have led to a great deal more ease when it comes to making, distributing and watching film. While this primarily provides benefits for the audience who now find it easier than ever to watch a huge variety of films whenever they want, it can also be exploited by film companies who can charge consumers for providing this ease of use when it comes to watching films. However, copyright theft loses the UK alone about £531 million each year and this number will only grow as it becomes easier and easier to download films illegally. The battle between this and increasing ease and lack of cost involved with making films will continue to rage. It is worth noting, however, that the biggest targets to film piracy are the popular blockbusters which are made by film studios to whom a few million pounds lost does not seem very substantial.


Wednesday, 15 February 2012

Never Let Me Go Presentation

Part 4 - A History of British Film Since 1984

Q1. What have been the primary developments in the UK film industry in the last 25 years?

It seems that in the last 25 or so years, film in the UK has generally become more commercial. With the introduction of the first UK multiplex in 1985, film became a more immersive, more glamorous experience, and audience numbers quickly began to increase. With more money in the industry, more films could be funded and produced, including successful indie films like Withnail and I and costume dramas like A Room with a View. Costume dramas were particularly successful in the USA, causing more money to come into the UK film industry. Films such as Four Weddings and a Funeral in the mid '90s were very successful as they were quintessentially British yet also entertaining and accessible, and proved a big hit in the US. This was followed by Sense and Sensibility, another big hit for the same reasons, which also starred Hugh Grant. The late 90s saw the development of more gritty British cinema such as Trainspotting, a film about hard drug culture in Edinburgh. This was followed by similar films such as The Acid House. The most successful films in the UK continued to be gritty dramas with a humorous aspect with films such as The Full Monty and Billy Elliot doing well. Notable exceptions were films such as Notting Hill (very much like Four Weddings and a Funeral, and with the same director and lead male) as well as Sliding Doors. Both films made use of an American star as the female lead, assuring box office success not only in the UK but in the USA as well.

Q2.



Q3. What kinds of films do Momentum Pictures look to distribute and why?

Momentum Pictures is a UK distribution company which has distributed many critically acclaimed films. Generally, they distribute dramas that look at characters rather than big budget blockbusters that focus more on an adventure or an epic event. Examples of this are Lost in Translation, Sofia Coppola's character study set in Tokyo, the Oscar-winning The King's Speech which tells the story of a King taking elocution lessons and Michel Gondry's Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind in which a couple remember their failed relationship. By doing this, Momentum Pictures can avoid spending large amounts of money on high budget blockbusters and instead spend less money on lower budget dramas that go on to be very successful due to the amount of thought and care put into them, which allows audiences to relate to them more.

Thursday, 9 February 2012

Part 3 - The British Film Industry

Q1. What do these statistics suggest about the current state of the British Film Industry? Does it seem to be in good shape?

From reading these statistics, it seems that the British Film Industry is indeed in good shape and still growing and becoming more popular. My principle statistics for this assumption is the cinema admissions for 2010 and the box office revenue. The admissions reached 169.2 million in 2010, a very strong total that was only 2% down on 2009 (an excusable drop when considering the presence of the World Cup and the winter's big freeze). To illustrate further the popularity of UK cinema, the 2010 box office revenue still rose despite increases in ticket costs to come to a box office revenue of £988 million, a 5% increase on 2009. Furthermore, the UK is currently the third largest film market in the world, making substantial contributions to the UK's GDP. UK filmmaking is also doing very well, adding to the success of the British Film Industry; 'Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1' earning almost $1 billion at the worldwide box office and 'Kick-Ass' was the highest grossing independent title of 2010.

Q2. How does film production in the UK seem to be very different from the Hollywood model?

In Hollywood, films are produced by large studios who buy the script and then generally use tens of millions of dollars making the film, using high-paid directors and actors, and marketing it. In the UK it is different due to lack of available money. Before making a film, a production company may have to find multiple investors simply in order to fund the film. In addition, multiple production companies may make one film in order to assure enough money is put into the film to have it made. A lot of money for films will also come from the government through things such as lottery funding, whereas in Hollywood this does not happen.

Q3. What does this information tell us about the state of the UK film industry in 2010?

This information tells us that the UK film releases of 2010 are still very much dominated by the US' output. While there are still a lot of films with British connections, it is hard to truly define a film as British as funding often has to be gained from other countries such as the US. Quite a shocking statistic is that the US films released in the UK in 2010 made up 72% of the total box office earnings, showing how much of a presence US films have in our market and how UK films still have a long way to go to dominate the market, sharing only 24% of box office earnings in 2010.

Q4. Use imdb.com or another website to find out the UK distributors of the films placed 6-10. How many of them could be considered British films? What does this say about the scale of the UK film industry?

Shrek Forever After was distributed by Paramount UK.
Twilight Saga: Eclipse was distributed by E1 entertainment in the UK.
Sherlock Holmes was distributed by Warner Bros UK.
Alvin and the Chipmunks was distributed by Twentiefth Century Fox UK.
Sex and the City 2 was distributed by Warner Bros UK.

The only one of these films which could be considered to be a British film is Sherlock Holmes as it was directed by the English Guy Ritchie and set in England. However, it was produced by two American studios so cannot be defined as truly British.

This suggests that the scale of the UK film industry is still relatively small as purely British films are still not able to reach into the box office top 10, only British-American films.

Q5. Which one of these two films recently released in the UK do you think is a BBC co-production and why?

I would think that My Week with Marilyn is a BBC co-production as it looks quite stylish yet understated as well as having many British actors in the cast, which are things that BBC films are known for doing well. I am also aware that the film is set in England. The poster for The Boy in the Striped Pajamas makes it look like it could be a BBC co-production, however I think it looks a little too cinematic and highly produced for quite a simple concept which makes me think it may not be.

Q6. Why do you think the Coalition government decided to close down the UKFC?

I think that the government closed down the UKFC because it did not appear stable and sustainable with its money. It appears that it was irresponsible with money and in tough economic times the government has an obligation to be extremely sensible with the taxpayers' money and so I imagine they felt it prudent to shut down the UKFC.

Q7. Do you think the film industry needs a body like the UKFC/BFI? Why?

Yes, I do think that we need such a body because, as David Puttnam said, it's the "strategic glue that binds a disparate sprawl of auteurs, craftspeople, circus barker and market traders". There are so many roles involved with creating film and so much bureaucracy that it seems very important to have an organisational body to manage the situation.

Wednesday, 28 September 2011

Part 1 - General Introduction Questions

Q1. Why is convergence both a blessing and a curse for the UK film industry?
Convergence presents many benefits for the UK film industry. First off it can greatly increase the amount of money that a film makes by making a film accessible to a larger audience. For example, a film based on a book already has an audience of all the fans of the book. Likewise when a film is based on a comic such as Spider-Man, any fans of the comic are likely to go and watch it. This also means that there will be more word of mouth for the film even before people have seen it as it already interests a great number of people regardless of the end product. Video games based on films are also common such as Quantum of Solace, a video game made based on a British film. This means that there's an even bigger audience consuming the film.

However, convergence also means a huge rise in popularity of digital media and the downloading of media. This means it is very easy to download any film you might want to see illegally over the Internet. Thus, UK films don't make as much money in DVD sales etc. and less money gets circulated back into the UK film industry.

Q2. How has the Internet allowed film-makers to find and attract audiences in different ways?
Popular Internet institutions such Youtube and Facebook allow film-makers to reach out to specific audiences. For instance, many Youtube videos have adverts these days, and if a film studio wishes to reach out to a younger audience then they can purchase ad space on the videos most popular with youths. Google also helps out film studios as it will monitor your searching and then provide adverts related to your searches. For example, if you were to search "action movies", a Die Hard advert may come up.

Q3. Summarise how you think sites like YouTube, Spotify and Facebook are good for film audiences. What do they let us do that we couldn't before?
Sites like YouTube, Spotify and Facebook allow users to share and indulge their interests instantly. If one wants to view a trailer for a film, they can go straight onto YouTube and watch it. They can then share it with their friends on Facebook, while listening to their favourite film soundtrack on Spotify. This means we can find what we want and are interested in very easily and have much more choice in our selection of media we choose to consume.

Thursday, 15 September 2011

How to make an intelligent blockbuster...

What I've learnt about the film industry:


One important thing I have learnt about the film industry from reading Mark Kermode's excerpt is the pressure put on modern filmmaking to do well financially and how that can cause filmmakers to make films that pander to a modern audience. Studios also appear to use the media to build up a lot of hype for films and to draw audiences in, such as, on 'Pearl Harbour', circulating rumours like "Michael Bay quit the project four times over various budgetary disputes", suggesting to audiences that the amount of money put into the film was controversially excessive and thus the film would be fairly spectacular. This is also shown in a studio's reluctance to let any director make a project he feels strongly about without a strong record of success with other projects.

Thursday, 8 September 2011

Ways In Which I Can Consume 'Friends With Benefits'

As soon as you visit the 'Friends With Benefits' official site, you are met with a pop up video in which the actors of the film inform you that there is no option to set "Friends With Benefits" as your relationship status and encourage you to click a link that will set your Facebook status to "I will be silent no longer! I support a "Friends With Benefits" relationship status option on all social networking sites. Click the link to join me."

There is a videos page on the website in which you can see the trailer for the movie and a few clips from the film. There is also a video quiz for the film and a game, as well as an interactive trailer.

There is also a gallery page on the website where you can view stills from the film.

Tuesday, 6 September 2011

My Media

Films:
Fast Times At Ridgemont High - Downloaded on filestube.com
Dazed and Confused - Downloaded on filestube.com
Final Destination - Downloaded on filestube.com
Adaptation - Downloaded on filestube.com
Being John Malkovich - Downloaded on filestube.com

TV:
The Office (US) - Downloaded on thepiratebay.org
Breaking Bad - Downloaded on filestube.com
Entourage - Downloaded on filestube.com
Curb Your Enthusiasm - Downloaded on filestube.com
Twin Peaks - DVD Box Set

Music:
Police - Outlandos D'Amour - Vinyl
Dillinger - Cocaine in My Brain - Vinyl
Elvis Costello - Last Year's Model - Vinyl
Metronomy - The English Riviera - MP3s bought on 7digital.com
Jamie XX - Far Nearer - WAVs bought on store.nmbrs.net
All other music listened to on Spotify.
All vinyls borrowed off my dad.

Social Media:
Ultra Culture - Blog
Dazed and Confused - Magazine
The Independent - Newspaper
Empire Online - Website
Cyanide and Happiness - Webcomic

Social Networks:
Facebook
Flickr
Twitter